ETHICAL AI DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA: INTEGRATING CULTURAL VALUES AND ADDRESSING GLOBAL DISPARITIES

ETHICAL AI DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA: INTEGRATING CULTURAL VALUES AND ADDRESSING GLOBAL DISPARITIES

Summary

Ethical artificial intelligence (AI) in Africa encompasses the development and utilization of AI technologies in alignment with ethical principles and societal values unique to the continent. Central to this endeavor are principles of fairness, transparency, accountability, privacy, and respect for human rights, which serve as guiding pillars for ensuring that AI systems benefit society while minimizing potential risks and harms.

Addressing challenges such as the lack of tailored guidelines and policies for the African context, stakeholders emphasize the incorporation of African perspectives into the global discourse on responsible AI. This involves integrating African moral traditions, such as community-focus and interconnectedness, into the ethical framework for AI development, ensuring technologies are not only technically robust but also culturally sensitive and socially acceptable.

Moreover, efforts to mitigate power imbalances in the AI ecosystem between the Global North and the Global South are paramount, requiring an inclusive approach to AI governance that considers the needs and values of all stakeholders, particularly those in Africa. African countries often find themselves dependent on technological innovations and regulations set by developed countries, leading to governance challenges and limited agency in shaping AI policies.

Proposed solutions for advancing ethical AI in Africa involve implementing safeguards to balance AI’s opportunities and risks, aligning AI frameworks with African cultural values like Ubuntu, promoting equitable and socially responsible AI practices, fostering inclusive partnerships involving local communities and policymakers, and prioritizing education and capacity-building initiatives.

By integrating ethical concepts into academic training and fostering grassroots engagement on AI ethics, stakeholders aim to nurture a culture of ethical awareness and accountability within the AI community and broader society. This multifaceted approach seeks to not only harness the potential of AI technologies for societal benefit but also safeguard Africa’s unique cultural heritage and ensure equitable distribution of AI benefits across the continent, thus paving the way for a technologically advanced, ethically sound, and socially responsible AI ecosystem in Africa.

Introduction

Ethical artificial intelligence (AI) refers to the development and deployment of AI technologies in a manner that is aligned with ethical principles, societal values, and legal standards.1 At its core, ethical AI emphasizes the importance of fairness, transparency, accountability, privacy, and respect for human rights in the design, implementation, and deployment of AI technologies.2 By prioritizing these ethical considerations, stakeholders aim to create AI systems that benefit society while minimizing potential risks and harms.

Principles of Ethical AI

One fundamental aspect of ethical AI is fairness, which entails ensuring that AI systems do not exhibit bias or discrimination against individuals or groups based on factors such as race, gender, or socioeconomic status.3 Transparency is another key principle, requiring that AI algorithms and decision-making processes be understandable and explainable to users and stakeholders.4 This transparency fosters trust and enables individuals to comprehend how AI systems arrive at their conclusions. Another critical component of ethical AI is accountability, as it holds developers, organizations, and users responsible for the outcomes and impacts of AI technologies.5 By establishing clear lines of accountability, stakeholders can address issues that may arise from the use of AI systems and mitigate potential negative consequences. Privacy considerations are also paramount in ethical AI, as safeguarding personal data and respecting individuals’ privacy rights are essential for maintaining trust and upholding ethical standards.

Human oversight is another important aspect of ethical AI, ensuring that humans retain control over AI systems and can intervene in decision-making processes when necessary.6 This human-centric approach helps prevent the delegation of critical decisions solely to machines and emphasizes the importance of human judgment and intervention.7 Additionally, addressing biases in AI algorithms and mitigating their impact is crucial to promoting fairness and equity in AI applications.8 Ethics-based auditing is described as a promising mechanism to bridge the gap between high-level ethics principles and the practical design and implementation of AI systems.9 This involves a continuous and constructive approach to align AI with ethical standards, supported by public policies and incentives that promote such alignment.10

Ethical AI in Africa

Ethical AI in Africa is a burgeoning field that is gaining increasing attention due to the rapid advancement and deployment of AI technologies across the continent. The need for ethical considerations in the development of AI and its deployment is emphasized and this highlights the importance of incorporating principles such as transparency, justice, fairness, harmlessness, responsibility, privacy, goodwill, freedom, autonomy, trust, sustainability, dignity, and solidarity.11 These principles serve as a framework for ensuring that AI technologies are developed and utilized in a manner that is socially responsible and aligned with the values and needs of African societies.

There are numerous challenges facing the development and implementation of ethical AI practices in Africa.12 One of the key challenges identified in the discourse on ethical AI in Africa is the lack of guidelines and policies tailored to the African context.13 The global AI ethics debate often overlooks the unique cultural, social, and economic dynamics of African countries, leading to a disconnect between the ethical principles guiding AI development and the realities on the ground.14 This gap underscores the importance of incorporating African perspectives and values into the global discourse on responsible AI to ensure that AI technologies are developed in a way that is sensitive to local contexts and respects the diverse cultural traditions present on the continent.

African moral traditions and values play a crucial role in shaping the ethical framework for AI development and governance in the region. Concepts such as community-focus, interconnectedness, and personhood are highlighted as essential considerations in the design and implementation of AI technologies in Africa.15 By integrating these cultural values into the global AI ethics discourse, stakeholders can ensure that AI applications in Africa are not only technically sound but also socially acceptable, culturally sensitive, and trustworthy.

Emphasis is placed on the importance of collaboration and engagement with diverse stakeholders from different backgrounds, interests, and values in shaping a dynamic AI ethics policy ecosystem in Africa.16 This inclusive approach is essential for building trust, promoting social acceptability, and addressing the challenges and opportunities that AI presents on the continent. Furthermore, concerns have been raised about the increasing presence of big tech companies in Africa, highlighting the power imbalances in the AI ecosystem between the Global North and the Global South.17 Countries in the Global South, including African countries, often find themselves dependent on technological innovations and regulations set by developed countries in the Global North, leading to a lack of governance capacity and limited agency in shaping AI policies.18 This dependency can result in material and workforce extraction, where natural resources, raw materials, and human labor from the Global South are exploited to support the operations of tech companies.19 The reliance on an invisible human labor force, predominantly located in countries of the Global South, underscores the vulnerability and dependence of these regions on external actors.20 Moreover, ethical governance challenges arise as the regulatory frameworks and ethical standards of big tech companies may not align with the values and needs of local populations, potentially leading to harm and ethical dilemmas.21 Addressing these concerns requires a more inclusive and equitable approach to AI governance that considers the perspectives and interests of all stakeholders, particularly those in the Global South.

Proposed solutions for the implementation of ethical AI in Africa

African and diaspora researchers have put forth a range of solutions to promote the development of ethical and responsible AI in Africa. Implementing safeguards to balance AI’s opportunities and risks is crucial for creating ethically sound and socially responsible technologies. Aligning AI frameworks with African cultural values, such as the philosophy of Ubuntu, integrates diverse sociocultural perspectives and enhances ethical relevance. Promoting fairness, transparency, and accountability in AI systems helps avoid biases and discrimination, fostering an inclusive society. Inclusive partnerships involving local communities, policymakers, and industry players ensure that AI solutions reflect local needs and values, promoting collaborative decision-making. Education plays a pivotal role in integrating African ethical values into AI development, with dedicated ethics courses and capacity-building initiatives nurturing ethical awareness among future practitioners. Broadening access to AI knowledge empowers individuals to critically assess and advocate for ethical practices. These solutions are expounded on below.

One key proposal is the introduction of safeguards to strike a balance between the opportunities and risks associated with AI implementation.22 By implementing measures to mitigate potential harms while maximizing the benefits of AI technologies, researchers aim to ensure that AI applications in Africa are ethically sound and socially responsible. Furthermore, there is a strong emphasis on defining African AI values and aligning AI frameworks with these values.23 Professor Virginia Dignum of Umeå University, in her contribution to the book “Responsible AI in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities” (Springer, 2023), argues that the impacts of AI technology are determined not by the technology itself but by the socio-cultural context in which it is used.24 She uses the philosophy of Ubuntu as a case study to illustrate how non-Western philosophical frameworks can inform the development of new socio-ethical principles. These principles highlight the importance of cultural diversity in contemporary AI ethics, suggesting that integrating diverse sociocultural perspectives can lead to more responsible and ethical AI applications. By incorporating cultural and ethical values specific to African contexts into the design and deployment of AI systems, researchers seek to create technologies that resonate with the local population and respect their unique perspectives and traditions.25 This approach not only enhances the relevance and acceptance of AI solutions but also contributes to the preservation and promotion of African cultural heritage in the digital age.

In addition to value alignment, the promotion of equitable and socially responsible AI practices is another critical aspect of the proposed solutions. AI practices involve perception, comprehension, action, and learning as the four capabilities AI artifacts must possess. 26 Equity and socially responsible AI practices therefore involve being proactive, embracing professional responsibility, employing evidence-based practice, and exercising social and political responsibility through courageous leadership and advocacy.27 These concepts look into addressing structural and racial or ethnic inequities, biases, and prejudices through proactive, evidence-based practice. Researchers advocate for the development of AI systems that prioritize fairness, transparency, and accountability, particularly in decision-making processes.28 By ensuring that AI algorithms do not perpetuate biases or discrimination, efforts are made to foster a more inclusive and just society where the benefits of AI are equitably distributed.

Education plays a pivotal role in facilitating the integration of African ethical values in artificial intelligence (AI) development on the continent. By incorporating ethical concepts into academic training and capacity-building initiatives for AI development actors, education serves as a foundational tool for instilling a deep understanding of and respect for African ethical values within the AI community.29 Through dedicated ethics courses and research programs focused on responsible AI in Africa, educational institutions can nurture a culture of ethical awareness and sensitivity among future AI practitioners, researchers, and policymakers. Moreover, education enables the democratization of technology by broadening access to knowledge about the impact and implications of AI among diverse stakeholders. By integrating AI ethics into educational curricula at all levels, from schools to universities and professional training programs, education can raise awareness about the ethical considerations inherent in AI development and deployment. This widespread dissemination of ethical principles not only empowers individuals to make informed decisions about AI technologies but also fosters a culture of ethical responsibility and accountability within the broader society.

Furthermore, training initiatives targeting the population on the fundamentals of AI ethics can enhance public understanding and engagement with AI technologies.30 By equipping users with the knowledge and skills to critically assess the ethical implications of AI applications, education empowers individuals to advocate for ethical AI practices and demand transparency and accountability from AI developers and providers. This grassroots engagement is essential for promoting ethical AI development that aligns with the values and aspirations of African communities.

The development and deployment of ethical AI in Africa require a multifaceted approach that balances technological advancement with the preservation of cultural values and societal well-being. By incorporating African moral traditions, fostering inclusive partnerships, promoting equitable practices, and prioritizing education and capacity-building, stakeholders can create AI solutions that are not only technologically advanced but also ethically sound, socially responsible, and culturally relevant. This approach will enable Africa to harness the potential of AI while safeguarding its unique cultural heritage and ensuring that the benefits of these technologies are distributed equitably across the continent.

1 Morley, J., Elhalal, A., Garcia, F., Kinsey, L., Mökander, J., & Floridi, L. (2021). Ethics as a Service: A Pragmatic Operationalisation of AI Ethics. Minds and Machines, 31, 239 – 256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09563-w.

2 African Union Development Agency, ‘AUDA-NEPAD APET Technology report on Artificial Intelligence for

Africa: Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Africa’s Socio-economic Development.’ https://www.nepad.org/publication/ai-africa-artificial-intelligence-africas-socio-economic-development

3 Youjin Kong. ‘Are “Intersectionally Fair” AI Algorithms Really Fair to Women of Color? A Philosophical Analysis.’ Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533114.

4 Upol Ehsan, Q. Liao, Michael J. Muller, Mark O. Riedl and Justin D. Weisz. “Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systems.” Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445188.

5 William Arome Adah, Nathan Adelola Ikumapayi and Haruna Bashir Muhammed. “The Ethical Implications of Advanced Artificial General Intelligence: Ensuring Responsible AI Development and Deployment.” SSRN Electronic Journal (2023). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4457301.

6 Barmer, H., Dzombak, R., Gaston, M., Palat, V., Redner, F., Smith, C., & Smith, T. (2021). Human-Centered AI. IEEE Pervasive Comput., 22, 7-8. https://doi.org/10.1184/R1/16560183.V1.

7 B. Lepri, N. Oliver and A. Pentland. ‘Ethical machines: The human-centric use of artificial intelligence.’ iScience, 24 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102249.

8 Nengfeng Zhou, Zach Zhang, Vijay Nair, Harsh Singhal and Jie Chen. ‘Bias, Fairness and Accountability with Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Algorithms.’ International Statistical Review, 90 (2022): 468 – 480. https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12492.

9 Mökander, Jakob and Floridi, Luciano, Ethics-based Auditing to Develop Trustworthy AI (February 1, 2021). Mökander, J & Floridi, L. (2021). Ethics-based Auditing to Develop Trustworthy AI. Minds and Machines, Online first. doi: 10.1007/s11023-021-09557-8 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3788841

10 ibid

11 Eke, D.O., Wakunuma, K., Akintoye, S. (2023). Introducing Responsible AI in Africa. In: Eke, D.O., Wakunuma, K., Akintoye, S. (eds) Responsible AI in Africa. Social and Cultural Studies of Robots and AI. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08215-3_1

12 Key challenges in developing ethical AI in Africa include lack of appropriate technology transfer mechanisms, lack of adaptation to local needs in technical and regulatory aspects, and little or no consideration of African perceptions of personhood and humanity.

13 Dorine E. van Norren. ‘The ethics of artificial intelligence, UNESCO and the African Ubuntu perspective.’ Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-04-2022-0037 .

14 ibid

15 Aisha Zahid Huriye. ‘The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Examining the Ethical Considerations Surrounding the Development and Use of AI.’ American Journal of Technology (2023). https://doi.org/10.58425/ajt.v2i1.142.

16 Angeline Wairegi, Melissa Omino and Isaac Rutenberg. ‘AI in Africa : Framing AI through an African Lens.’ (2021). https://doi.org/10.4000/CTD.4775.

17Aníbal Monasterio Astobiza, T. Ausín, Belén Liedo, M. Toboso, M. Aparicio and Daniel López. ‘Ethical Governance of AI in the Global South: A Human Rights Approach to Responsible Use of AI.’ The 2021 Summit of the International Society for the Study of Information (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2022081136.

18 I. Tingzon, James Matthew Miraflor, Xiao Xiang Zhu and M. Kochupillai. “Towards Impactful Applications of AI4EO in the Global South.” 2023 Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event (JURSE) (2023): 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/JURSE57346.2023.10144197 .

19 M. Böhm. “Criminal Business Relationships Between Commodity Regions and Industrialized Countries: The Hard Road From Raw Material to New Technology.” Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime, 1 (2020): 34 – 49. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631309X19887681 .

20 H. Schandl, Marina Fischer-Kowalski, J. West, S. Giljum, M. Dittrich, N. Eisenmenger, Arne Geschke, Mirko Lieber, H. Wieland, A. Schaffartzik, F. Krausmann, Sylvia Gierlinger, K. Hosking, M. Lenzen, H. Tanikawa, A. Miatto and T. Fishman. “Global Material Flows and Resource Productivity: Forty Years of Evidence.” Journal of Industrial Ecology, 22 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12626 .

21 Ash Malhotra. “Are Tech Companies Dangerously Veering Away from Their Managerial Accountabilities?.” Proceedings: ITP Research Symposium 2022, 30 November – 2 December (2023). https://doi.org/10.34074/proc.2302013 .

22 Kiemde, S.M.A., Kora, A.D. ‘Towards an ethics of AI in Africa: rule of education. AI Ethics’ 2, 35–40 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00106-8

23 D. O. Eke et al. (eds.), ‘Responsible AI in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities.’ Social and Cultural Studies of Robots and AI, (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08215-3_9

24 ibid p.208

25 J. Zamaraeva and M. Kolesnik. ‘On the issue of cultural (African) specifics of “responsible artificial intelligence”.’ Asia, America and Africa history and modernity (2023). https://doi.org/10.31804/2782-540x-2023-2-1-43-75.

26 R. Bawack, S. Wamba and Kévin D. Carillo. ‘A framework for understanding artificial intelligence research: insights from practice.’ J. Enterp. Inf. Manag., 34 (2021): 645-678. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-07-2020-0284.

27 Aileen M. Reid. ‘Vision for an equitable AI world: The role of evaluation and evaluators to incite change.’ New Directions for Evaluation, 2023 (2023): 111 – 121. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20559.

28 Alessa Angerschmid, Jianlong Zhou, Kevin Theuermann, Fang Chen and Andreas Holzinger. ‘Fairness and Explanation in AI-Informed Decision Making.’ Mach. Learn. Knowl. Extr., 4 (2022): 556-579. https://doi.org/10.3390/make4020026.

29 M. Carman and Benjamin Rosman. ‘Applying a principle of explicability to AI research in Africa: should we do it?.’ Ethics and Information Technology (2020): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09534-2.

30 Virginia Dignum. ‘Ethics in artificial intelligence: introduction to the special issue.’ Ethics and Information Technology, 20 (2018): 1 – 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9450-z.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked