Fostering AI Innovation in Africa: Synergizing Intellectual Property Rights and Open-Source Software Models

Fostering AI Innovation in Africa: Synergizing Intellectual Property Rights and Open-Source Software Models

Introduction

Emerging technologies play a critical role in the development of the information component of society, as they revolutionize how we as a society utilize and generate information.1 Specifically technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) have a profound impact that penetrates “the economy and society at large”.2 Therefore, to fully actualise its potential of fostering innovation, “an appropriate legal framework is key.”3 The Intellectual Property (IP) system is the main legal system tasked with fostering innovation and economic development, as it is designed to propel human innovation.4 However, AI inevitably changes the “human element of innovation”, therefore providing a new area of regulation for the IP system.5 Therefore, with the accelerated and intense application of AI and its innovations in modern day, the exploration of the relationship between IP and AI becomes vital.

This blog aims to assess whether the IP system provides a supportive environment for the development of AI related innovations. Specifically, it aims to explore the role of the Open-Source Software model in facilitating access and use of IP protected datasets within Africa’s innovative ecosystem. 6

The Need for the Open-Source Software Model (OSS)?

Producing new AI outputs requires significant inputs, primarily in the form of training data.7 However, data is not a freely accessible commodity; it is often proprietary and owned by individuals and corporations. The proprietary nature of data creates the need for mechanisms for data providers to recover the costs associated with data generation.8 Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) serve this purpose by restricting the use of IP-protected data without consent.9 AI-generated innovations, particularly those focused on public interest, heavily rely on data that possesses “public good characteristics.”10 Despite the public interest aspect, this data still falls under the scope of IP protection, which poses significant risks of liability if utilized without consent.11 For example, copyright infringement liability can arise in AI development when IP-protected data is used to generate AI training data.12 Such practices lead to legal uncertainty and potential litigation risks for innovators and end users13. While the IP framework does provide some flexibility through statutory exceptions, such as text and data mining exceptions, these exceptions are often limited and may not adequately address the unique needs of AI developers.14

Consequently, there is a pressing need for alternative approaches, such as the Open-Source Software (OSS) model, to facilitate access to data and promote innovation in AI.15 This is specifically relevant in the African context, where large corporations can arbitrarily exclude smaller markets, such as African markets, to access these ‘proprietary goods’.16 Such exclusion stifles the growth and functionality of AI technologies in these markets, limiting access to essential tools that could empower local communities and foster innovation.17

The Role of Open-Source Software in Africa’s AI Ecosystem

The Open-Source Software (OSS) movement emerged in the late 20th century as a response to the restrictive nature of proprietary software, emphasizing community-driven development and knowledge sharing.18 This foundational ethos has been pivotal in shaping the current AI landscape, where open-source frameworks and tools are integral to research and application.19 The OSS model allows for the public dissemination of source code, enabling users to access, modify, and improve upon existing software, which is crucial for AI development.20 The OSS model is particularly relevant in AI due to the complex nature of machine learning and deep learning frameworks, which often require broad, interdisciplinary collaboration to optimize performance and applicability.21

In Africa, the OSS model holds significant potential for addressing the unique challenges faced by the continent. For instance, the integration of AI in medical imaging practices has been hindered by infrastructural challenges, such as poor equipment maintenance and obsolete technology.22 By leveraging open-source frameworks, African researchers and practitioners can develop tailored solutions that are sustainable and adaptable to local conditions. Open-source AI tools can facilitate the creation of innovative applications that cater to the specific needs of African communities, thereby enhancing the accessibility and effectiveness of AI technologies in critical sectors such as healthcare and education.23

Moreover, the OSS model promotes inclusivity by allowing a diverse range of stakeholders to participate in AI development. This is particularly important in a continent where linguistic and cultural diversity is vast. Open-source initiatives can empower local developers to create AI applications that are culturally relevant and linguistically appropriate, thereby bridging the digital divide that often marginalizes smaller markets.24 For example, the implementation of AI/ML tools in drug discovery centers in Africa demonstrates how OSS can support local innovation and capacity building.25 By providing access to free and constantly updated software, these initiatives enable researchers to contribute to global knowledge while addressing local health challenges.

The OSS model also plays a vital role in promoting transparency and accountability in AI systems. Proprietary AI technologies often lack the openness necessary for public scrutiny, making it difficult to assess their safety, security, and fairness.26 In contrast, open-source frameworks allow researchers and practitioners to examine algorithms and data, facilitating the identification and rectification of biases and errors.27 This transparency is crucial for building trust in AI technologies, particularly in sectors where ethical considerations are paramount, such as healthcare and education.28

As the Open-Source Software (OSS) model continues to demonstrate its potential for driving innovation, inclusivity, and economic growth across the African continent, it becomes increasingly important to explore how this collaborative framework can effectively integrate with intellectual property (IP) rights to maximize its benefits while ensuring the protection of developers’ contributions.

A synergistic opportunity? Intellectual Property (IP) and Artificial Intelligence (AI)

The synergy between Open-Source Software (OSS) and intellectual property (IP) rights within the African continent presents a unique opportunity to foster innovation and inclusivity. As the OSS movement continues to gain traction, particularly in the technology sector, it is essential to explore how it can effectively coexist with IP rights to maximize its benefits for African nations. The OSS model promotes community-driven development and knowledge sharing, allowing users to access, modify, and improve upon existing software. This is particularly relevant in Africa, where many countries face significant technological challenges and resource constraints. However, the effectiveness of OSS in driving innovation is often contingent upon a supportive IP framework that balances the protection of developers’ rights with the need to encourage collaboration.29

The synergy between OSS and IP rights can promote inclusivity by enabling local developers to participate in the global technology ecosystem. In many African countries, access to proprietary software can be prohibitively expensive, limiting opportunities for innovation. OSS provides an alternative that allows developers to create and share solutions without the financial barriers associated with proprietary licenses.30 Furthermore, a well-defined IP framework can enhance the credibility and sustainability of OSS initiatives.31 By protecting the rights of developers and ensuring that their contributions are recognized, IP rights can incentivize participation in OSS projects.32

However, it is crucial to strike a balance between protecting IP rights and promoting the open nature of OSS. Overly restrictive IP policies can stifle innovation and limit the collaborative spirit that is central to the OSS movement. Therefore, policymakers in African countries should consider adopting flexible IP frameworks that accommodate the unique characteristics of OSS while still providing adequate protection for developers. This approach can help create a conducive environment for technological advancement. As the continent continues to embrace OSS, it is essential to ensure that IP policies are aligned with the goals of fostering collaboration and innovation, ultimately benefiting all stakeholders involved.

Conclusion

The intersection of AI and IP presents both challenges and opportunities, particularly in the African context. The OSS model offers a pathway to enhance collaboration, reduce costs, and improve access to essential datasets for AI development. However, addressing the proprietary nature of data and the associated legal challenges is crucial for creating an environment conducive to innovation. By fostering a flexible IP framework that supports open access, African nations can harness the full potential of AI technologies to drive economic growth and societal advancement.

The image source : “Mapping the UNESCO Open Science Recommendations to GigaScience” by Scotted400 .

 

1 Kokhanovska E & Kodynets A, Protecting of Intellectual Property under Conditions of the Information Society Development [2021] Sci.innov, Vol 17(1) 104.

2 Drexl J, Hilty R, Desaunettes-Barbero L, Globocnik J, Begona G O, Hoffmann J, Kim D, Kulhari S, Ritcher H , Scheuerer S, Slowinski R P & Wiedemann K, Aritificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Law Position Statement of the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition of 9th April 2021 on the Current Debate (2021, Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition) 1.

3 ibid.

4 Karanikic P, Artificial Intelligence in the Digital Economy: Intellectual Property Protection Challenges [2024] 47th MIPRO ICT and Electronic Convention, 1002.

5 ibid.

6 Drexel et al.. (n2); one of the thematic issues pointed out when assessing the role of IP law across the AI innovation cycle.

7 Cuntz A, Carsten F & Stamm H, Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property: An Economic Perspective [2024] WIPO Economic Research Working Paper No. 77/2024,21 ; training data, here, entails data such as source codes for AI development.

8 ibid.

9 ibid.

10ibid.

11ibid…20.

12 ibid.

13 ibid.

14 ibid.

15 Data in this context is in relation to software, such as source codes.

16 Shrestha R Y, Krogh v G & Feuerriegel S, Building open-source AI [2023] Nature Computational Science 3, 908.

17 ibid.

18 Subhani S, Is open-source software the future of software development? [2020] IJBHT Vol 10(1).

19 Langenkamp M & Yue. N D, How Open-Source Machine Learning Software Shapes AI [2022] Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics and Society.

20 Shrestha(n16) 909.

21 Nguyen G, Dlugolinsky S, Bobak M, Tran V, Garcia L A, Heredia I, Malik P & Hluchy L, Machine Learning and Deep Learning frameworks and libraries for large-scale data mining: a survey [2019] Artificial Intelligence Review, 52(1).

22 Antwi K W, Akudjedu N T & Botwe O B, Artificial Intelligence in medical imaging practice in Africa: a qualitative analysis study of radiographers’ perspectives [2021] Insights Into Imaging 12 :1.

23 Onyebuchi N C, Unachukwu C C & Osawaru B, Review of AI in Education: Transforming Learning Environments in Africa [2024] International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 5(10).

24 Akanbi M O., & Ojo J, Open Source Software as a Tool for Promoting Digital Inclusion in Africa. [2023] African Journal of Information Systems, 15(1).

25 Shrestha (n16).

26 ibid.

27Ruttkampj-Bloem E, Epistemic just and dynamic AI ethics in Africa [2023] Social and Cultural Studies of Robots and AI, 13-34.

28 ibid

29 Blind K & Schubert T, Estimating the GDP effect of Open-Source Software and its Complementarities with R&Amp and patents: evidence and policy implications [2023] JTT 49(2).

30 Bakar A D, Sultan A B & Zulzalil H & Din J, Open Source Software adaptation in Africa [2014] IJOSSP 5 (1).

31 Blind(n29).

32 Chen X, Institutional logic dilemma and Suggestions of Open-Source Innovation: A Case Study of blockchain [2022] GJMBR, 45.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked